- For years, Native activists have been urging the Kansas City Chiefs to retire the team’s name, the arrowhead and other signs of cultural appropriation.
- The Chiefs have, over the years, dumped what activists say were the worst of its motifs. But some Indigenous people want the franchise to go further.
- Activists plan to travel to Glendale, Arizona, for Super Bowl Sunday with signs and messages to make their voices heard.
PHOENIX – When the Kansas City Chiefs take the field against the Philadelphia Eagles on Super Bowl Sunday, they will sport white uniforms with a distinctive logo: an arrowhead with the initials KC emblazoned on the surface.
And greeting them among thousands of football fans: Native activists who have been urging the team to retire the name “Chiefs,” the arrowhead and the rest of an accumulated 60-plus years of cultural appropriation and stereotyping.
The Chiefs have, over the years, dumped what activists say were the worst of its motifs – as they banned fake headdresses and Native-themed warpaint from fan faces and initiated a working group of local Native people to advise them.
But some Indigenous people told The Arizona Republic, part of the USA TODAY Network, that fans still use the same chant, appropriated from old Hollywood Western movies, and continue to enter Arrowhead Stadium with inappropriate Native-themed headdresses and war paint.
Michael Spears, an actor from a South Dakota tribe, said appropriating Native imagery is something tribes never signed on for.
Super Bowl Central: Super Bowl 57 odds, Eagles-Chiefs matchups, stats and more
“People think they’re honoring us with these mascots and logos, but they’re mocking us,” he said.
In November:New York public schools must drop Native American mascots or lose funding, state officials say
Voices:We honored sports teams with racist mascots. Not anymore.
Kansas City’s mayor, a Boy Scout ‘tribe’ and the Chiefs
The Chiefs were born as the Dallas Texans in 1961 as part of the old American Football League. A logo created by newspaper cartoonist Bob Taylor featured a cowboy carrying a football under one arm and brandishing a six-shooter, all superimposed over the state of Texas.
When the team moved to Kansas City in 1963, the owners changed the name to the Chiefs, a fan favorite in a name-the-team contest. The team’s website said the new identity paid homage to Mayor H. Roe Bartle, who had invited the team to relocate from Dallas.
The name wasn’t meant to refer to Native peoples, the team says, but rather to Bartle’s time as an executive for the Boy Scouts. Bartle founded the Tribe Mic-O-Say, an honor society that appropriated Native motifs and nomenclature, in 1922. Bartle was named “Chief Lone Bear,” a nickname he was known by for the rest of his life.
Nation:US changes names of nearly 650 places with racist Native American women term
The “tribe” appropriated Native culture on a wholesale scale. They had “reservations,” “bands,” and “societies,” each with its own regalia and dances. Rhonda LeValdo, a member of the Acoma Pueblo, said she was appalled to learn that the “tribe” was performing its own version of the sacred Eagle Dance.
Chiefs’ logo, mascot and other cultural appropriation
Along with the new name came a new logo, also created by Taylor: a shirtless Native man sporting washboard abs, a large feather headdress, buckskin leggings, moccasins and a loincloth. He wielded a tomahawk instead of a revolver and was depicted in front of the six-state area surrounding Kansas City. The “chief” was cradling a football.
Along with that came even more appropriation: the “arrowhead chop,” a big powwow-style drum that reverberated at the start of home games, a chant straight out of a Hollywood Western and lots of fans wearing fake headdresses and war paint. The team even brought out its very own mascot: Warpaint the horse.
Other teams took full advantage of the Chiefs’ logo in their own marketing. In 1963, one ad promoting a matchup between the Chiefs and the New England Patriots featured a Revolutionary War soldier with his rifle hidden offering an Indian chief some shiny beads.
The same person who is credited with giving the Super Bowl its name and using Roman numerals for each year’s big game also created the team’s current logo. The stylized arrowhead with the letters KC in the center was designed by the Chiefs’ founder and first owner Lamar Hunt, who scrawled the first iteration on a napkin in 1972. Hunt said he was inspired by the San Francisco 49ers’ motif.
The website Sports Logo History shows the previous and current logos for the Kansas City team.
A new mascot, KC Wolf, made his debut in 1989. Warpaint came back for a short time beginning in 2009.
In 2014, the Chiefs started talking with some local community members. The Chiefs banned headdresses and Native-themed warpaint from the stadium in 2020. In a statement, the Chiefs also said they would review other inappropriate practices, such as the “Arrowhead chop.” Warpaint was retired for the final time in 2021.
The team also features Native people at the drum (which is still in use), and members of the Native advisory group decided they were fine with the name “Chiefs.”
The team website also lists other outreach events, such as hosting football clinics for tribal youth in various communities, educating the public about Indigenous regalia at games and during Native American Heritage Month, and blessing the team drum and honoring drum groups.
The Chiefs said they were unable to fulfill a request by The Arizona Republic to speak with a team official or American Indian Working Group member about any of these activities or to address the concerns raised by Native people.
Native mascots and sports teams are coming under fire
Sports teams have used Native imagery, cultural items and even dances to promote their teams for more than 100 years.
The trend caught on quickly and hit its peak in the 1920s and ’30s when high schools, universities and professional teams adopted names like Indians, Braves, Chiefs and in one case, the former name of the Washington Commanders football team. That name was a word considered as offensive to some Native people as the N-word is to Black people.
Communities rallied behind their teams. Fans bedecked themselves in “headdresses” and painted their faces as they imagined a Native warrior would. They whooped “war” cries and chopped their arms in the motion used to wield a tomahawk or other hand weapon when their team scored. They sang songs, danced imitations of actual tribal sacred dances and chanted how they thought Native people would chant.
In the 1970s, when Native peoples experienced a cultural and political renaissance, those mascots and team names were revealed as offensive and even harmful to Indigenous youth. Native activists began calling for the elimination of the names and practices, much as Black and Latino activists retired similar mascots like Little Black Sambo and the Frito Bandito.
But activists say change is hard in the sports world. Even as mental health groups like the American Psychological Association and Native rights groups such as the National Congress of American Indians call for sending mascots and offensive or inappropriate practices to the trash bin, some teams and many fans have resisted the movement. One study even found that bias against Native communities increased as mascots are consigned to history.
Voices:How Native women activists fought racist Washington team nickname and won
Progress has been made to eliminate offensive team names, such as the one in Washington, D.C. After decades of protests and a grassroots effort by Indigenous activists, the team changed its name.
The Cleveland Indians also retired their mascot, Chief Wahoo, in 2018 after nearly 75 years. And in 2021, the team formally changed its name to the Guardians for the 2022 season.
Native people say: Let us tell our own story
Many Indigenous people want the Chiefs to go further while asking that the current rules be enforced.
LeValdo said fans were still using the “touchdown” chant, a stereotypical tune, at Chiefs games. She and other activists have seen fans with headdresses entering the stadium.
“They don’t seem to care,” she said.
Gaylene Crouser, executive director of the Kansas City Indian Center and a member of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, and LeValdo said the most vocal anti-mascot activists were not invited to any talks with the team, nor do they anticipate ever being at the table.
“The team has worked hard to put out the illusion that they work with tribes because they do work with a few tribal members,” Crouser said. “But they weren’t interested in talking to us because they knew what we would have to say.”
The Indian Center didn’t become officially involved with the anti-mascot group until a few years ago, she said. But they had talked with LeValdo and other longtime activists after a particularly egregious incident in late 2013 – when a local Sonic restaurant posted a sign that said, “KC Chiefs, Stomp the (R-word), feed them whisky, send 2 reservation.”
“It was so unbelievably racist,” Crouser said. The Indian Center sent people, including cultural practitioners, to the owners to explain why the sign was unacceptable.
In the meantime, she said, the center launched a site called Not in Our Honor, and has worked to raise awareness of why mascots and all the accouterments that go with them are harmful.
Some fans haven’t taken the news well.
“Even though the team has tried to take away the most blatant racism … there’s still so much left with the chopping and the business with the drum and that same behavior,” Crouser said. “It’s nothing for us to have people come up and scream in our faces and start singing that mimicking-stereotypes song and just start chopping right through our face.”
Crouser said, “When fans scream that they mean to honor Native Americans, they are passing Native people who literally are holding a sign saying ‘There is no honor in this.’
“We love our team, but we don’t love the name and we don’t love the chop.”
What’s everyone talking about? Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day.
In an interview with The Republic from his Montana home, Spears, a member of the Kul Wicasa Oyate Lakota Lower Brulė Sioux Tribe, said the issue hit him hard while filming “The Year of the Dog,” a film in which he played the protagonist’s AA sponsor. Spears persuaded the producer to change a scene where the main character, a non-Native man, shows up in an Atlanta Braves cap.
In the film, Spears says, “We’re real people. … I’m not a goofy cartoon. We don’t do the Tomahawk Chop. … And that makes a difference in how we feel about ourselves.”
Once in Pine Ridge, South Dakota, Spears saw non-Indian parents taunting the Native players and dousing them with beer. It was an example of why inaccurate imagery is bringing harm to Indian Country.
“These images create the opportunity for white people to appropriate our culture,” Spears said. “Imagery is storytelling and we need to tell our own stories.”
Spears said stopping appropriation and misunderstanding will require people to hear and accept some hard truths.
“Communicate to each other, ask what would bring honor to us,” he said.
Protests planned for Super Bowl
Crouser and other Native people plan to travel to Glendale, Arizona, for Super Bowl Sunday with their signs “Love the team, hate the name” and other signage to make their voices heard. They invite others to join them, Crouser said.
“Kansas City deserves better.”
Amanda Blackhorse, the Navajo woman who led a team of Native people who sued the NFL to remove the offensive name from the Washington team, said she would stand with Crouser and other activists.
Her group, No More Native Mascots, is working with the Kansas City Indian Center to organize the protest. Blackhorse said that while they will welcome the Chiefs, the team will encounter many more Native people in Phoenix than in Kansas City, Missouri. “They’re not in Kansas anymore,” she said.
Follow reporter Debra Krol on Twitter at @debkrol.
The Arizona Republic’s coverage of Indigenous issues at the intersection of climate, culture and commerce is supported by the Catena Foundation.
